ODC Theater

Music Moves Festival : A Conversation with Christy Bolingbroke | By Marie Tollon

Dance and music oscillate on similar tracks. They share an ephemeral nature and an ability to illuminate human experiences in ways words cannot. Their similarities prompted the late French choreographer Maurice Béjart to state that “dance is visual music.” ODC’s Music Moves Festival, which spans over four weeks in August, explores the continuing dialogue between the two art forms. ODC Deputy Director for Advancement Christy Bolingbroke curated the festival and tells us more about its programming.

Marie Tollon: Can you tell us how this festival came into being?

Christy Bolingbroke ODC Deputy Director for Advancement Photo by Meg Messina

Christy Bolingbroke
ODC Deputy Director for Advancement
Photo by Meg Messina

Christy Bolingbroke: Part of our mission is to engage, inspire and cultivate audiences. I don’t want to just look for a theme or an idea that’s relevant, but I also want to make sure that it’s about access points for audiences to tap into art. In terms of learning music, my experience was through my own work with the Mark Morris Dance Group and realizing there that the dance audience is only so big and music audiences are a little bit bigger. It was a great entrance for music audiences to appreciate dance by looking at it through the lens that they are most familiar with, being music. And I wanted to use that as a conversation point for this entire season. And then some other things dovetailed. We were doing the Next Moves summer intensive for pre-professional adult dancers and I wanted to make sure to really amplify our summer performance programming. So it became more of a festival, over 4 weeks with 11 programs, as opposed to a season-long idea with just 3 or 4 events.

MT: The festival includes yearly programs such as Summer Sampler, Dance & Diaspora, and Theater Unplugged. How are they customized to fit the festival’s theme?

CB: The festival’s theme worked very well with some of the things we were already doing like Summer Sampler with the flagship company, or Dance & Diaspora, our ongoing exploration into culturally-rooted dance forms and where our global dance faculty are taking it. Music is a natural tie there. With Theater Unplugged, a mini-residency, why not elucidate the opportunity for audiences to see how music as a choice really informs the making of the work? Not to say that every artist works that way but I was specifically looking for artists to go on that journey with us. Antoine Hunter and Milissa Payne have totally different approaches and I’m excited for them to be in conversation.

In terms of how we can raise audiences’ awareness on how they are connecting with the work, it is questions like “Did you know that music? Did you come in already thinking that Bach’s Goldberg’s variations should be something and if someone creates a dance to that, and it counters what your expectation was, what does that look like?” that informed the programming of the Thursday, Friday, Saturday dance shows. They have different music choices and sometimes it might be music that people are familiar with and sometimes it might be original music. The Sunday, Monday and Tuesday shows are about voice and embodied music.

We talk about artistic voice a lot, and that doesn’t always mean the actual vocal sound in dance. Playing with how we could illuminate that for audiences was something I was really interested in. And then it becomes about bringing the coolest, most interesting and fascinating people, both West Coast-based and elsewhere while tying it back to the Next Moves curriculum’s three different tracks: contemporary performances, American cultural forms and dance thinking.

MT: Although you don’t necessarily have a say in the music choice that the artists are making, does the festival abide to a larger definition of music, including silence, spoken text, for example, as part of the soundscape?

UnknownCB: It’s interesting when you look at music versus dance, how in dance, we try to categorize things all the time, but it’s still pretty general: there’s ballet and there’s not ballet. When we look at modern dance, so many people who see the work we do would call it ‘modern dance,’ and there would be some people who would say “It’s not Graham, Cunningham, Limon, or Horton, it’s not modern dance.” The general public doesn’t care about that difference; it’s such a small idiosyncrasy. While when you consider music, there are so many different genres: indie rock, jazz, blues, folk, classical, etc. Then world music has so many connotations to it. The reality is that in France, if they hear American bluegrass that’s actually world music to them. So I don’t have a specific guideline or [say to myself] “I want to expose people to all kinds of music.” It’s really about presenting quality and excellence as our core values whether that’s virtuosity or some demonstration of craftsmanship on stage that illuminates the power of art and creativity for our audiences.

MT: What were you considering when choosing artists to participate in the festival?

Melecio Estrella and Damara Vita Ganley in Joe Goode's "Irresistibly Drawn"

Melecio Estrella and Damara Vita Ganley
in Joe Goode’s “Irresistibly Drawn”

CB: Besides reaching our core values of quality and excellence, there is always the pragmatic “Who is available, who is around?” Regardless what the overall arch or curatorial theme for the year is, I am also personally interested in artists that straddle the high brow and low brow, the conceptual and the contemporary art performance. San Jose Taiko and The Bangerz, Pearl Marill do that. I’m looking for artists who are not just selling a particular idea or work but are willing to share their creative exploration with us. When I had seen Irresistibly Drawn and found out that [Joe Goode] was interested in touring it, I wanted to host it as a great musical anthology of his work and a wonderful demonstration of the relationship between song and dance; priming audiences for the rest of the festival. With Dance Heginbotham, it speaks to our role for nationally emerging artists in the arts ecosystem. We are a launching platform for such artists, back to when Bill T. Jones, Karole Armitage, or Eiko and Koma had their West Coast debut at ODC [then New Performance Gallery]. John [Heginbotham] has experienced wonderful accolades so far and he happens to be a musical choreographer. Music Moves is a tremendous opportunity to host Dance Heginbotham’s West Coast debut.

And then there’s our role and who we are as presenters in the ongoing West Coast–East Coast conversation. We continue a relationship with Kate Weare and her work. And Randee Paufve, a wonderful mid-career artist whom we hadn’t seen on our stage in a while, had a piece that featured live cello and piano. Paufve and Weare have a lovely friendship offstage so this was a fortuitous double bill to further embed the coast-to-coast comparison in the festival.

MT: The relationship between dance and music is the major thread running through the festival. Can you identify other commonalities between the curated artists?

CB: I think that there is an inner connectivity. With Weare and Paufve, there’s always a question of lineage, and connection, how much is either implicit or explicit. The inherent relationship between movement and sound, and the embodiment of that, whether they are actually making noises themselves -like Keith Terry or Namita Kapoor- or are simply painting it in a visual way. With Rueda Con Ritmo, they will often have four different circles doing different choreographies to one music in their classes. It’s not just beautiful to watch, they are also illustrating the music in a different way. Something like that, with the sense of a community, also related to embodying an aesthetic for dance and music, is what is interesting to me. One of the things that Mark Morris would say is that singers and dancers are the closest possible because both have the same instrument, the body. That has always resonated with me. Dancers and musicians might not have the same sort of theme that they are exploring but that is a connective thread. That’s one of the reasons I’m delighted ODC/Dance will perform Breathing Underwater during Summer Sampler because it starts with one of the dancers [Natasha] singing a cappella.


The Distance Traveled By Wondering | Guest Post by Michelle LaVigne

There is a certain distance to travel when writing about dance; can one write as much as one sees, feels, and hears? It is not easy to grasp the totality of any particular dance piece or (even more so) an entire festival. The festival’s program notes, however, are superbly crafted to offer a nuanced sense of each work as well as how they intersect along similar themes related to identity, culture, and space. What is left behind after the dancing ends? What echoes? What resonates? What (still) moves? For me, it’s not the quality of the dancing, which was piercingly composed and executed. It’s not the superb music that accompanied each piece. And it’s not the creative use of spaces in, outside of, and across from the ODC Theater. For me, what echoes days after ODC Theater Director Christy Bolingbroke’s artfully curated evenings of dance on Friday and Saturday nights (Programs A and C) is the clever interplay between words and dance.

Amy O'Neal in "The Most Innovative, Daring, and Original Piece of Dance/Performance You Will See This Decade" Photo by Bruce Clayton Tom

Amy O’Neal in
“The Most Innovative, Daring, and Original Piece of Dance/Performance You Will See This Decade”
Photo by Bruce Clayton Tom

Words matter and names can matter even more as evidenced in Lionel Popkin’s Ruth Doesn’t Live Here Anymore and Amy O’Neal’s The Most Innovative, Daring, and Original Piece of Dance/Performance You Will See This Decade. Popkin’s piece emerges out of extensive research on Ruth St. Denis, especially her journals. And in her program notes, O’Neal describes her piece as an “essay.” Beyond these textual preliminaries, both choreographers use words to help bridge the distance between dance, music, and video – words become a part of how ideas and questions are expressed, a part of the movement on stage. In these two dances, words are not merely accessories to prop up choreographic meaning; they are fundamental to how Popkin and O’Neal move thought, how they think. What grabbed my attention in particular was how each piece used names that opened up fissures of meaning, leaving me to wonder how to connect the dots between now and later, past and present.

At the beginning of Ruth, three dancers roll in a line on the floor (and over each other) as the names of Ruth St. Denis are displayed above on a screen also in a line. These names mirror different moments in Denis’ life (birth, marriage, stage) while also pointing to shifts in identification and changes of circumstance. There is a certain humor as well as solemnity in this seemingly endless ticker tape of names and the continuous rolling of bodies on the floor below. This kind of inter-word play between wit and gravity is a dominant feature throughout the 30- minute excerpt. The naming and names of Ruth St. Denis, however, are particularly striking. This part of the dance opens up a field of inquiry about our struggles to discover who we are and what defines us over time. Denis, it seems, is not quite past; she has more to teach us about how to move. The Most Innovative, also an excerpt of a longer work, incorporates movement, words, and video, to ask about the difference between power and empowerment, the struggle to find creative voice, and the irritability of sexualized and gendered bodies. At the end of the piece, O’Neal projects the names of people – relatives, teachers, dancers, choreographers, musicians, DJs – that have influenced her work. This multitude of names suggests that making (i.e. choreographing) is an ongoing process of layering, or sampling. This visual weight is underscored by the movement sequence of O’Neal’s final solo (“Exhibit H”) that is both punctuated and soft, a refreshing mix of sensibility and form. This ending also opens up a field of inquiry about how the names we carry with us are woven into the fabric of who we are struggling to become as artists or otherwise – are we truly more than just the sum of our parts, past or present?

Lionel Popkin, Emily Beattie and Carolyn Hall in "Ruth Doesn't Live Here Anymore" Photo by Cristal Jones

Lionel Popkin, Emily Beattie and Carolyn Hall
in “Ruth Doesn’t Live Here Anymore”
Photo by Cristal Jones

The bringing together of words and movement on stage is not new, but the ways Popkin and O’Neal entwine them left me wondering – how do words move? Both Popkin and O’Neal offer some answers. One possible way that words move is to expose gaps of meaning. O’Neal highlights the distance between power and empowerment by first asking what is the difference between them and then dancing a “strip-tease” to a cover of Money Changes Everything. By mixing up words with moves, power and empowerment move not as definitions, but as questions or doubts. Words also move by playing with our sense of time. Popkin’s piece relies heavily on Denis’s choreographic notes, her words, to create movement. These past words are not stagnant, but alive as they are mixed into the present in new ways, shortening distance between old and new. Thus, the fissures created by the mixing of words and movement cultivate more, or less distance. Both dances use words to move between past, present, and future, and between different ways of being or becoming.

In the end, Ruth and The Most Innovative suggest that this mixing of words and bodies is a mode of cultivation, a process of micro and macro articulation, which can bring us closer to distant pasts and future paths. And yet, I still wonder. How do these works participate in conversations outside of the theater? How can they help bridge distances between where we are now and where we want to be? Can these dances help find new ways of thinking about issues related to artistic creation, gendered culture, and political power? Such questions don’t have easy answers, but I am happy to be left wondering, and I look forward to more.

Michelle LaVigne is an Assistant Professor at the University of San Francisco in the Department of Rhetoric and Language. Her writing/research focuses on the intersection of dance, rhetoric, and performance. In particular, she writes about the persuasive qualities of dance movements and aesthetics, and how practices of rhetoric might be rethought from the movements of dance. In addition to speaking at national and international conferences, she has published reviews in the Quarterly Journal of Speech and Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. She can be reached at mrlavigne@usfca.edu

Identity is Just a Costume Change Away: Walking Distance Dance Festival’s Program A (Lionel Popkin and Headmistress) | Guest Post by Hope Mohr

The first night of the Walking Distance Dance Festival featured a brilliant pairing by ODC Theater Director Christy Bolingbroke: Ruth Doesn’t Live Here Anymore by Lionel Popkin and two works by Headmistress, Mongrel and Shame the Devil. Each work on the program examined identity as collage of the ancient and the new.

Sherwood Chen in "Mongrel" Photo by Robbie Sweeny

Sherwood Chen in “Mongrel”
Photo by Robbie Sweeny

Headmistress is the collaborative team of Amara Tabor-Smith and Sherwood Chen, artists in residence at ODC Theater. Sherwood Chen performed Mongrel, a ritualistic, riveting solo performance. Entering the space, the audience saw Chen spinning without stop. Chen’s entire body was obscured by layer upon layer of mismatched clothing including a red balaclava, silver fabric tied around his mouth reminiscent of duct tape, mismatched gloves, heavy boots, several skirts and pants, and a small mirror hung around his neck. Covered head to toe, Chen’s uninterrupted spinning around the edges of the space—he never entered the central spotlight—became hypnotic. No face, no identity, no gender, no race, no recognizable dancing style: the ambiguity of the image threw a spotlight on my own need to locate meaning. (Later, when Chen removed the mirror from around his neck, he placed it on the floor to face the audience.) When Chen finally stopped spinning, the effect was electric. He began a postmodern striptease that expertly travelled back and forth between his internal world and the external reality of the audience. Occasionally stopping as if to address us, Chen would drop again into brief visceral dances like someone caught between past and present. Once shed, Chen’s motley bundle of clothing occupied a spotlight of its own like a patchwork identity no longer useful. Snippets of glitchy white noise came and went. Stripped down to one layer of simple black clothing, Chen passed in and out of the light through moments of slumped exhaustion and spinning bursts. In his final swaying backwards walk towards the audience, Chen held a small mirror so we could catch only portions of his face. It was an elegant and elegiac finale. Chen’s Mongrel shows us an ancient, subconscious body embedded in fractured contemporary consciousness. All we have to do is peel the layers away.

Amara Tabor-Smith in "Shame the Devil" Photo by Robbie Sweeny

Amara Tabor-Smith in
“Shame the Devil”
Photo by Robbie Sweeny

Amara Tabor-Smith, the other half of Headmistress, performed Shame the Devil in the evening’s interstices. In the lobby pre-show and on the sidewalk between and after acts (Chen and Popkin’s company performed in different buildings), Tabor-Smith offered intriguing glimpses of deeply inhabited ecstatic states. Shaking, crying, and jumping, Tabor-Smith was possessed by shifting states often in close proximity to audience members paying varying degrees of attention. Tabor-Smith challenged an audience in transit to be present to the rituals of the performing body. Unfortunately, the Festival’s framing of Tabor-Smith’s material diluted its power: surrounded and often ignored by the Festival’s pedestrian foot traffic, Tabor-Smith’s potent presence did not receive the respect it was due. Similarly, a supporting ensemble of women that performed brief installations throughout the evening created satellites of imagery without context. Did Tabor-Smith choose to place these events outside the theater? Did she want to remind us how often we miss moments of transcendence?

Lionel Popkin and Emily Beattie in  "Ruth Doesn't Live Here Anymore" Photo by John Altdorfer

Lionel Popkin and Emily Beattie in
“Ruth Doesn’t Live Here Anymore”
Photo by John Altdorfer

Whereas the pleasures of Mongrel arise from its ambiguity, the pleasures of Lionel Popkin’s Ruth Doesn’t Live Here Anymore arise from its intelligence. Popkin’s Ruth was performed here as an excerpt of a longer evening-length work, which makes it difficult to evaluate the work fully on its own terms. Nonetheless, even from the sample shown, Popkin’s voice shone through in a knowing, joyful conversation with the ghost of dance icon Ruth St. Denis, a conversation that functioned also as a vehicle for musings on the vagaries of translation. Popkin is the dance’s MC, narrating its conceptual underpinnings in confessional asides. Popkin introduced us to the importance of costume in St. Denis’ work as dancers unloaded several trunks full of costumes onto the stage. Carolyn Hall had a raucous headlong solo with the costumes, metaphors for pieces of identity that, in Popkin’s words, “slip off the skin.” Popkin also introduced us to St. Denis’ choreographic “kits,” which she created to allow others to reconstruct her dances. Projections of St. Denis’ choreographic notes provided the backdrop for Popkin’s playful mistranslations, which masterfully wove stylized gesture and postmodern pure movement. But movement invention per se is not the point of Ruth Doesn’t Live Here Anymore: Popkin is more concerned with the intellectual process of translating concept into choreographic structure. Popkin excels at creating rich task-based images with clear relationship to his source material. Popkin repeatedly kissing the body of Ruth (Emily Beattie) in unison with Hall tapping a microphone wonderfully conjured the image of the voice of the body. Another powerful image involved a flickering projection of St. Denis’ choreographic notes vanishing word by word over time to leave only redacted traces. In the dance’s final haunting moment, Popkin used a leaf blower to move a heap of costumes over the prone lifeless body (of Ruth). Like Chen holding a mirror up to his face as he backed toward his audience, Popkin revealed himself in fragments. At one point, Popkin blithely thanked his mother for providing the Indian saris used in the show, revealing a subterranean poignancy under the formidable intellectual skin of his work. Popkin made his ideas accessible, but kept his inner life out of reach.

Hope Mohr is an artist in residence at ODC Theater and the artistic director of Hope Mohr Dance. She’ll be teaching composition August 4-9 in ODC’s Next Moves summer intensive. In September, HMD’s Bridge Project will present Have We Come A Long Way, Baby? curating is always in conversation with history, a program exploring the West Coast postmodern dance lineage through an intergenerational lineup of female soloists, including Anna Halprin, Simone Forti, Mohr and Peiling Kao. In addition to the curated performances, programming will include master classes, panel discussions on curatorial thinking and the relationship of dance history to contemporary work, and a series of related writings and films. http://www.hopemohr.org/projects

Staining Each Other: A Conversation with Headmistress | By Marie Tollon

The full meaning of a language is never translatable into another. We may speak several languages but one of them always remains the one in which we live. In order to completely assimilate a language it would be necessary to make the world which it expresses one’s own and one never does belong to two worlds at once.

Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Phenomenology of Perception

Similar to language, the body is imprinted with the mark of the world in which it is rooted. Through their work, dancers and choreographers Amara Tabor-Smith and Sherwood Chen engage in acts of translation, both between their respective bodies and with artists from other cultures, to further explore and navigate the world(s) in which we live. Confronting the inherent untranslatability between two realities evoked by French philosopher Maurice Merleau-Ponty, they investigate the context, assumptions, and power structures that exist within the space between bodies, histories and cultures.

Headmistress Photo by Robbie Sweeny

Photo by Robbie Sweeny

In 2009, they founded Headmistress, a collaborative entity which is currently in residence at ODC Theater. Tabor-Smith is a former Associate Artistic Director and dancer with Urban Bush Women and her training is rooted in the traditional dance forms of Africa. Chen’s movement vocabulary is highly influenced by his work with artists Anna Halprin and Min Tanaka. In anticipation of Headmistress’ performance at Walking Distance Dance Festival-SF, I spoke to both artists.

Marie Tollon: What was the impetus for working together?

Amara Tabor-Smith: We spent a lot of time dancing together in the clubs. That was the basis for our work. Recognizing that although it is not necessarily validated from a contemporary dance perspective, the spirit that is generated or cultivated in those environments is a fertile ground. What would it mean for us to try to keep the thread of that magic happening and create work in the studio, work that we would perform? It wasn’t so much that the dance floor movement made its way into our choreographic process but the spirit of it did. That imprint was made and it became something else in the studio, but it was that magic and that connection that continued in everything else.

When we first started working together, some people were very intrigued about this duet between an Asian man and an African American woman. Those reactions had a lot to do with race and assumptions about whom they thought we were. We both knew that, even before we would take a step, people’s glasses would be colored -no pun intended- with how different we were, when actually it was our chemistry, our ‘kindredness,’ that brought us to work together and not so much our differences.

MT: In our earlier conversation, you mentioned: “One of our early intentions was to stain each other.” Can you elaborate on that notion of staining each other?

Sherwood Chen: Both of us are aware and proud of our roots, both culturally and artistically. We were not trying to move away from them. We were drawn to each other as much for the places we resonate, as for the ones where we felt like we were foreign to each other – foreign bodies in the most metaphorical and literal sense. We gave each other the permission to experience something that had nothing to do with our respective backgrounds. Working directly with Amara gave me the permission to explore movement vocabularies in a creation environment, in ways I had prior refused myself.

Going back to the notion of stain, it has so many negative connotations in English. If you stay with somebody long enough, even if you are still considered a foreign body, it’s going to mark you indelibly. You can’t take it back. You cannot go back to where you are coming from. We were not trying to become one another, but we became different artists than what we were.

Headmistress Photo by Ana Teresa Fernandez Projections by Jefferson Pinder

Photo by Ana Teresa Fernandez
Projections by Jefferson Pinder

MT: Sherwood, the space created between two bodies, two trainings, two cultures, brings to mind the notion of décalage, a French word which you use and which roughly translates as ‘discrepancy’ or ‘interval.’ This notion, along with the question of translation, is one that you have been investigating, both within and outside of the context of Headmistress. Can you talk more about it?

SC: I muse on translation in my work because in the traditional act of translation from one language to another, there is a tension between the guaranteed betrayal of the source material and the moral ambition to make the effort anyway. Lucidly recognizing an inevitable degree of missing the mark. Understanding this tension. Framing it. Trying to work with it as a source for performing material.

MT: In an interview at the Headlands Center for the Arts, where Headmistress was in residency in 2010, you stated: “Our questions were similar. It was your training and forms that were different.” What questions did you two have in common?

SC: Questions about identity, culture and our aesthetic heritages and negotiations with them. Questions about race, power and differentiating between institutionalized perspectives and where we are coming from. In the San Francisco Bay Area, these questions are very common, and in that sense we are Bay Area artists. But neither of us were interested in rendering these questions legible on stage for their own communicative sake. Instead, these enduring and personal dialogues have been the process-oriented springboard for formal investigations in performance.

MT: Outside of the U.S., Headmistress has participated in residencies in Senegal, Brazil and France. What were you interested in exploring? How did those experiences affect the work?

ATS: One of the things that we often say is that we both have the experience of ‘other’ in the United States. Yet, there is a way in which this is our home, we also are from this place, even if in this culture we are ‘other.’ We wanted to see how other places – where we are ‘other’ in other ways- would stain us.

SC: We were already addressing foreignness between us in the studio. Could we crank up the fire by putting ourselves in these other situations, all the while knowing that travel is associated with privilege? I am constantly struggling with the spectrum between the worst of cultural appropriation, and an effort toward exchange -which implies a balance of power- to allow myself to receive and to offer. To say “we are all one” avoids addressing imperialism and the ways in which power can be changed. Being in residency abroad keeps me in line, makes me vigilant towards my own naivetés.

Headmistress Photo by Robbie Sweeny

Photo by Robbie Sweeny

MT: Sherwood, the questions relative to cultural appropriation permeate in one of the solos that Headmistress is presenting at WDDF-SF, notably through the use of a song by Moroccan singer Hamid Zahir. Can you elaborate?

SC: When I was exposed to the song over twenty years ago, it resonated with me. I had no idea what they were saying. The song lived with me, I lost it and then found it again a couple years ago online. I played it acontextually in one of my workshops in Brussels. A Moroccan-French participant and colleague approached me afterwards to tell me how that song spoke to her deeply of her childhood, her roots. That became my motivation to treat this as a jumping off point because this song could not have illustrated more the divide between her and me – of deep nostalgia she lived and the sense memory of the Rabat streets which this chaâbi song evoked in her, and then me, some young American who heard the song randomly on a cassette tape one day in suburban Los Angeles. Both of us were touched but in different ways. This difference creates a gap. The shift from analog to digital to memory to live performance also yields many gaps. I am trying to problematize rather than resolve these tensions.

MT: Amara, part of the other solo that Headmistress is presenting at WDDF-SF consists of a jumping sequence anchored within a repetitive rhythm. Watching this moment I felt your body read as a history book of untold, or less told, stories. Can you share a bit of the making process?

ATS: I am stripping bare, peeling layers. I keep searching for the place where I can be as vulnerable and as open as possible in public. How much darkness, and light and spirit, can I expose to my audience? Where is the line and when is it too much? And I don’t know until I am in it. I think of it like jazz musicians, in search of something deeper. If you can appreciate that it is not always the thing that brings you joy or comfort, or makes you think “Oh I understand,” if you allow yourself to just breathe it in, maybe there are other levels that you can’t necessarily articulate or intellectualize. But I’m more a feeler, I’m trying to live in that place, I’m trying to live in the question, and keep digging for more questions, than answers. I’m trying to stay loyal to the spirit that wants to come through.

MT: You often choose to set your work in unconventional spaces, such as the street, a store or the lobby of theater. How do these alternate spaces affect the work?

ATS: I am less interested in theater space. It doesn’t mean that I won’t perform in the theater but I’m finding a home where my performance is more accessible to anyone who happens upon it, and is transformed by whomever happens upon it. Because there is a more direct contact with the audience, so that line between the performance and audience is more dissipated, the present changes the experience – which also makes it harder for me many times to articulate what is going to happen. There are set intentions, and even logistically some set aspects, but all of that could change. When I did my piece “He Moved Swiftly…” as part of Dancer’s Group/ONSITE dance festival, every moment was impacted by who was there. Some things that happen were crazy, magic, heartfelt, and chaotic. And I like that. That’s home for me. That’s taking the story where the story wants to be. My intention is to be diligent to the spirit of what is trying to come through.





Going the Distance: Walking Distance Dance Festival-SF Program Notes | By Marie Tollon

The festival format provides a unique opportunity to travel the many paths that have been thoughtfully carved out by each of the participating artists. But what kind of distance(s) are we asked to go here? There is the physical distance between the two buildings in which the festival happens, allowing us an intake of fresh air and a casual chat with fellow viewers as we cross the street to attend the second part of the program. There is the space between two artists whose work is featured on the same bill, and the fertile dialogue it creates. And what about the gap between the familiar and the unknown that the artists, each in their own way, are encouraging us to consider?

Doug Elkins Choreography, Etc. in "Hapless Bizarre" Photo by Christopher Duggan

Doug Elkins Choreography, Etc.
in “Hapless Bizarre”
Photo by Christopher Duggan

WDDF-SF also bridges the distance between East and West Coasts, by inscribing the voices of seven choreographers – six of which are based on the West Coast- within the larger artistic conversation. The latter has been recently fueled by the question of cultural appropriation, which manifests in the work of several artists of this edition, echoing Philadelphia’s Remix Festival, which addressed current intellectual property laws and the art of samplingvia choreography earlier this month.

Choreographers Lionel Popkin (Los Angeles), Amy O’Neal (Seattle), Doug Elkins (New York) and performance entity Headmistress (Bay Area) each insert their own lens on this issue. In Ruth Doesn’t Live Here Anymore, Popkin inquires whether dance artist Ruth St Denis’ orientalism was an act of cultural appropriation or a legitimate examination of the sources of dance. O’Neal explores the relationship between sampling and creativity by collaging different styles of dance in The Most Innovative, Daring, and Original Piece of Dance/Performance You Will See this Decade. With his Bay Area debut in Hapless Bizarre, Elkins tackles the issue of appropriation by sourcing French director Jacques Demy’s 1964 musical film The Umbrellas of Cherbourg. Similar to O’Neal, Elkins mingles many genres of dance, providing what he calls a “collision of languages” in a piece that navigates the boundaries between physical comedy and dance. Headmistress draws from observing and absorbing the work of artists in Brazil, Senegal and France to investigate cultural cross-pollination in its two solos.

Rachna Nivas Photo by Margo Moritz

Rachna Nivas
Photo by Margo Moritz

A look at how identity is constructed and represented also permeates the work of several artists of this edition. Of both Indian and Jewish descent, Popkin examines his cultural lineage by questioning the accurateness of the South Asian imagery that populates his dances. Headmistress researches how context informs identity while O’Neal challenges the performative representations of gender, race and sexuality.

Featuring works accompanied by live musicians, Heidi Duckler Dance Theatre (Los Angeles), Rachna Nivas of Chitresh Das Dance Company (Bay Area) and Garrett + Moulton Productions (Bay Area) emphasize the relationship between movement and music. Set in a bowling alley, Duckler’s Bowling Blues reflects on how art re-contextualizes our experience of space and vice versa. The two Bay Area choreographers highlight the mesmerizing expressivity of the body: Garrett and Moulton’s A Show of Hands exposes the manifold stories hands can enact, while in Nivas’s Bhakti, eyebrows, fingers and arms communicate the intricacies of the life of the mystic princess Meerabai, who defied the role assigned to her by the patriarchal Indian society of the 16th century.

With its three programs, the festival contributes to building a variety of poetic landscapes. Whether we journey through one or through all of them, we can track how the creative paths delineated by the artists crisscross, join or diverge from one another.

So let’s put on our walking shoes and go the distance(s).

When Dance Finds an Unconventional Stage | By Marie Tollon

Taking the dance out of the theater and into the public sphere is certainly not a new preoccupation within the dance world. In the Bay Area and beyond, artists have been challenging traditional ways dance is both presented and staged since the 1960s, by providing a variety of viewing platforms for their work, outside of conventional performance venues. What does the dance gain and/or lose from being transposed onto an unconventional stage? How is movement affected by the context of a specific site? Inversely, how is the experience of space informed and transformed by the choreography? What kind of dialogue is established between the work, its voluntary audience and its incidental one?

Heidi Duckler Dance Theatre "Laundromatinee" Photo by Vivian Babuts

Heidi Duckler Dance Theatre
Photo by Vivian Babuts

When setting their work outside of the traditional dance theater space, artists are forced to consider the site, which inevitably informs both the ambience and structure of the work by way of sound, form and movement. Choreographer Heidi Duckler surely knows something about that. Hailed as the “reigning queen of site-specific performance,” she has been working exclusively in nontraditional sites for nearly 30 years. Based in Los Angeles and founded in 1985, Heidi Duckler Dance Theatre inserts dancing bodies within places charged with a specific role and history, such as hospitals (Catch Your Breath, 2012; The Groundskeepers, 2013), vacant lots (Expulsion), trailers (At the Oasis, 2013), Laundromats (Launderland, 1998) and bus terminals (Kiss n’ ride, 2012).

Her Bowling Blues, which will be part of the WDDF-SF next weekend, is a site-adaptive work that takes place at Mission Bowling Club, a bowling alley located across the street from ODC Theater. In an interview, Duckler explained her work process and how space influences the choreographic material: “The movement comes from the location and the site. There is no studio movement. The work also is very collaborative. I create the content, and the dancers work on the movement–they partner with each other, they utilize the site, and they teach each other.”

Heidi Duckler Dance Theatre "Bowling Blues" Photo by Lou Parisot Gignac

Heidi Duckler Dance Theatre
“Bowling Blues”
Photo by Lou Parisot Gignac

Placing dance outside of traditional venues is also a way for Duckler to build community and bring the art form to audiences who are not necessarily familiar with dance: “I view location, history, and community as my creative partners. I consistently draw upon the conceptual complexity and identity of each location to drive the creation and implementation of my company’s professional performances and learning opportunities. Therefore, we inadvertently, yet strategically build communities with each project,” Duckler explained to Dance Mogul Magazine.

If Bowling Blues exposes how choreography and space impact each other, it also delineates how sound and movement converse. Featuring live music by Claire Gignac, the dance echoes other works which explore the relationship between music and dance within the context of the festival.

Dance and Music: One Artistic Form | By Marie Tollon

The format of the upcoming Walking Distance Dance Festival-SF (WDDF-SF) gives viewers a chance to see astute pairings of artists whose work may at first appear to be stylistically and thematically different, but whose juxtaposition reveals similarities that may inform how you view each of them. Such is the case with the works of Garrett + Moulton Productions and Rachna Nivas of the Chitresh Das Dance Company. While the work of choreographers Janice Garrett and Charles Moulton is based on contemporary dance, Nivas’ choreography is rooted in Kathak, an Indian dance that incorporates spoken rhythm to intricate footwork and twirls. Yet, the work of both companies is embedded in a sophisticated exploration of the relationship between dance and music, and will feature live musicians at the WDDF-SF.

Rachna Nivas Photo by Margo Moritz

Rachna Nivas
Photo by Margo Moritz

In a phone conversation, Nivas explained that the musical component is inherent to Kathak, where it’s “traditional [for the dancers] to interact with the musicians.” She notes that “as Kathak dancers, we are actually musicians with our body. That’s one thing we have in common with a tap dancer. We are percussionists. So in the interaction with the musicians, it’s not just between dance and music, but also between music and music.” (On a side note regarding the similarities between tap and Kathak, Nivas’ teacher, renowned Kathak maestro Pandit Chitresh Das, often performs with Emmy-award winning tap dancer Jason Samuels Smith and also collaborates with flamenco dancer Antonio Hidalgo Pax in transporting feats of rhythm)

For Garrett and Moulton, the choice to bring live music to the stage comes from “a conscious decision to break out of using recording music and a commitment to work with musicians,” Garrett explains. “There’s nothing like it! There is a real oneness of these two art forms, dance and music. They are really a form. It is a creative necessity for us, in terms of where we want our work to live.” The original score of A Show of Hands –the piece that Garrett and Moulton are restaging for the WDDF-SF- is by composer Dan Becker and will be performed live by the Friction Quartet.

Nol Simonse in Garrett + Moulton Productions'  "A Show of Hands" Photo by RJ Muna

Nol Simonse in
Garrett + Moulton Productions’
“A Show of Hands”
Photo by RJ Muna

Beyond the common desire to commission and include live music on stage, other similarities are revealed when seeing the work of these artists in the same program. A Show of Hands is based on a series of 100 drawings of human hands by Moulton. The artists chose 24 of them to form the backdrop of the dance. Garrett then choreographed the piece based on the drawings. “[Charles’] interest had to do with the hands’ expressiveness, what they can reveal about our human experience. In the studio, we used the different states of expression that Charlie had proposed as a springboard for choreographic material,” Garrett mentions.

Hands are also a very important aspect of Indian dance, which highlights their expressivity, although, as Nivas explains, “out of the eight Indian classical dances, Kathak is the least complex with hands.” In Bhakti, the piece that Nivas will perform at WDDF-SF, hands serve, along with eyes, eyebrows, arms and feet, to illustrate excerpts from the life of Meerabai. This Indian princess lived in Rajasthan at a time of political unrest, when women were being kept behind closed doors. “Meerabai was a very unique being” Nivas states. “She rejected society’s norms and ignored her husband to pursue her love for the deity Krishna. She gained a lot of followers, which was unprecedented at this time, and although there were several attempts at her life, she managed to seek spiritual liberation from this world.”

Watching Garrett + Moulton Productions and Nivas’ works, we are invited to explore both the obvious and the more subtle ways music and movement intertwine, as well as the universality of experience that comes through the human body, whether it is trained in contemporary dance or in Kathak.

(Uncertain) Weather Report: A Conversation with Kimi Okada | By Marie Tollon

My young daughter’s room usually offers a state of tidiness until about 10 minutes after it’s been thoroughly cleaned. At a tornado’s pace, toys and accessories of multiple colors and shapes, pieces of clothes from all seasons, hats and sticks, accumulate all over the floor, rendering the room into a splendid chaos. So the thought of 49 young people evolving within the relatively narrow space of a theater’s backstage, and given the considerable task to manage hundreds of props, is enough to humble me. For ODC Associate Choreographer and School Director Kimi Okada, no task is too big when it comes to giving youth opportunities to learn about the craft of dance. Uncertain Weather, the youth production that she directed and which third season opened last weekend at ODC, comprises 49 children and teenagers, from 7 to 18. Okada and I talked over tea.

What was the genesis of Uncertain Weather?

Kimi Okada

Kimi Okada

We always wanted to have performance opportunities for kids. Prior to this production, they either had the choice to be in the Dance Jam, which is a major commitment, or to audition for the Velveteen Rabbit. Otherwise we just had informal performances at the end of a session. We decided that we wanted kids to be in a real production and work on something where they could have the discipline, and the fun, of learning about performance and stage vocabulary, preparing for an audience and seeing something through from the beginning. With the creation of the theater, we had the venue to fully produce it.

What is the artistic vision behind Uncertain Weather?

I wanted to do a production that showcased the whole school, as well as the different ages and styles of dance that we have. Yet, I wanted to get out of the mentality of school productions, which is often in recital format, and do a seamless production with an artistic through line, in which you experience all kinds of things in an Alice in Wonderland or The Wizard of Oz kind of way. We came out with the idea of uncertain weather because that theme allows a lot of play.

"Uncertain Weather" Photo by Bowerbird Photography

“Uncertain Weather”
Photo by Bowerbird Photography

The audience sees all the adventures unfolding onstage through the eyes of three girls, whom I see as hopeful spirits who experience all kinds of weather. I was inspired by the movie Beasts of the Southern Wild, which is about survival and community. For instance, in one piece, I wanted to address the fact that when disasters happen, they leave an unbelievable mess and people have to deal with it. How do you survive a disaster of some kind? How do you go on? Faced with all the detritus left behind by a huge storm, the girls initiate the making of crazy costumes out of garbage and decide to do a fashion show!

Can you tell me more about the genres of dance and the artists involved in the piece?

I choreographed many of the pieces with Tanya Bello, who is the assistant director choreographer. We try to make this a consistent production, just like The Nutcracker or The Velveteen Rabbit. But because of the way the piece is structured, there is flexibility and there are some small changes over the years. This year, I invited guest choreographers to do specific dance genres. Bianca Cabrera choreographed a hip-hop piece about earthquakes called Deck and Cover, Namita Kapoor choreographed a tap and a Bollywood piece, Elizabeth Castaneda created a ballet piece. I also worked with Dennis Hysom, a wonderful composer who wrote the music. He did a brilliant job making all the transitions, adding sound effects, and making sure that all the music is seamless.

What is the learning experience for the performers?

"Uncertain Weather" Photo by Bowerbird Photography

“Uncertain Weather”
Photo by Bowerbird Photography

Kids do not have to audition for Uncertain Weather but they have to commit to coming to rehearsal once a week for the whole school year, and they have to be enrolled in one technique class of their choice. The real challenge is that the backstage choreography is equally as important as the stage choreography. The kids have to know how to do fast costume changes and props. We have a lot of help backstage to help indicate where to exit, where to put props… The 13 dance jam members are also very important because they help with prop work and transitions, and they also appear within several pieces and do their own dedicated piece.

In the original production, some of the kids were involved in helping make up the material. I like to choreograph that way. ‘How do you feel when you get hit by a giant wind? What does that feel like?’ I’d asked them. They also have to learn how to be in an ensemble, how to be aware of their space, all the things that dancers have to learn. Also, I think the age mix is quite special. There’s a lot of generosity from the older kids, who feel they have to be examples and help the little ones be excited about dancing. We try to create an atmosphere of mentorship and develop the spirit of community, ensemble, and support.

The emphasis on the youth seems really important to ODC. Can you talk more about that?

I feel that the school is one of the big legacies that ODC is going to leave behind. After we are all gone, I’m hoping that the school will continue as a major dance center and that it will still embrace the values that we have, which is not just high quality training, but the importance of creativity, individual expression, and community. I feel we are very specially positioned as the youth and teens program is surrounded by professional artists. We have a presenting theater, and a professional company. The kids are constantly seeing dancers, staff, faculty, people who have devoted their life to dance and the arts. We are trying to create more connections between the company and the school. We do in-house field trips in the classes that meet at least twice a week. At some point during the session, we take the children to the studio to watch the company and the company sometimes does outreach activities. We have such an advantage to be able to offer that kind of expansive picture, from the professional highest end model to the sheer enjoyment, recreational and health-oriented values of dance. The fact that we have so many adults taking class shows you that you don’t have to stop dancing as you get older.

"Uncertain Weather" Photo by Bowerbird Photography

“Uncertain Weather”
Photo by Bowerbird Photography

I am also incredibly moved by young people, and I especially love teens. I know what they go through. Once you break through that veneer of self-consciousness, protectiveness and defensiveness, they get so genuinely inspired and excited about things that they give so much back. What keeps me going as a school director is realizing that we have the capacity to really change young people’s life or to steer them in a direction that they might not even have thought was possible. For me that’s a life mission.


A Conversation with Dance Addict Wendy Perron | By Marie Tollon

On her website, Wendy Perron lists the many occupations that she has held throughout her life. She has been a “dancer, choreographer, teacher, writer, editor, and always a dance addict.” Even if she hadn’t mentioned the latter two words -or highlighted them in red- you would still notice her voracious appetite for dance by reading her recent book. Published in 2013, Through the Eyes of a Dancer compiles a selection of reviews, essays, interviews, profiles and blog posts which weave a formidable tapestry of the last four decades of dance history.

Wendy Perron Photo by Mary Wyatt

Wendy Perron
Photo by Mary Wyatt

With the embodied knowledge of a dancer, the organizational mind of a choreographer and the discernment of a critic, Perron takes us through the enthralling exploration of the sixties, the surge of performance art of the seventies, the exuberant “downtown” scene of the eighties, shadowed by the devastating impact of AIDS on the dance community. She guides us through the appearance of the internet, noting its effect on both dance makers and critics -how the virtual world allowed artists to be exposed to and integrate other genres and styles, while creating room for many voices to manifest online.

Perron’s book does not only capture both the minute tremors and the larger waves that affected the dance world since the sixties, but it also allows us to revisit our own history as viewers, and consider how our gaze and perceptions may have shifted throughout the years. Browsing through the different chapters, we travel back in time, and sometimes in space, remembering a specific piece, and how it informed our life back then. For instance, when reading her words on Pina Bausch’s Nelken (1982), I was reminded of the captivating performance by dancer Dominique Mercy, whose ferociously carved face and body composed moments that edged on a thrilling line where humor and despair collided. Similarly, Perron’s manifesto-style blog post on Ralph Lemon’s How Can You Stay in the House All Day and Not Go Anywhere? (2010) brought me back to a piece which, at the time, felt like a house with many rooms, each the host of some hard-lived truths about love and loss. I enjoyed the sharp-blade efficiency of Perron’s writing in addressing and revealing such a vulnerable work.

Perron will give a book reading at the Walking Distance Dance Festival-SF on May 31, at 6pm, at ODC. In anticipation of her reading, I talked to her by phone.

MT: When referring to your early days as a performance viewer, you wrote: “Only by talking about [a performance] could I get closer to understanding it.” Today, is it the same need to understand what you see that drives you to attend and write about dance?

WP: I think it has changed. Before I would see something and would want to talk about it. Now, when I see something, I think about what I would want to write on my website, which I contribute to in addition to the blog I post for Dance Magazine once a week. I am always thinking about the thoughts that make me want to write. For instance, there was a tribute to Steve Paxton at the Danspace Project earlier this week. Jennifer Monson performed an improvisation that was so fantastic that I thought: ‘What is the lineage between her and Steve Paxton?’ It’s not a question which I could answer automatically, but I thought that if I sat down and wrote about it, it may allow me to delve into it. Questions such as ‘What will I find out as I write about this?’ make me want to write.

MT: The cover photograph of your book is from Pina Bausch’s Bamboo Blues. Does this choice reflect an artistic connection to the German choreographer’s work or is it a way to avoid the difficult task of choosing among a plethora of American choreographers whose work you relate to?

CoverWP: I had initially thought that I could put a photo of myself as a dancer, but I realized that all the pictures of my dancing self were in black and white, because I pretty much stopped dancing 15 years ago. The photo needed to be in color, in a vertical format. The publishers looked around and sent some color photos from pieces of choreographers whom I didn’t write or care about. Somehow I saw this photo of Pina Bausch’s Bombay Blues, a piece that I have seen twice. The second time was at the Spoleto festival in Italy, five days after Pina Bausch died. Seeing the company perform that piece, which is so joyous and sensuous, right after she died, was an amazing experience. And yes, you’re right, I didn’t have to put an American choreographer on the cover. I did ask myself: ‘Would I put a photo of Trisha Brown or Martha Graham, or someone else?’ But I didn’t want it to be a book about Trisha Brown. The funny thing is that some people think that the woman on the cover is me! I love the picture because I think it’s lively, funny and seductive.

MT: In a recent interview with Wayne McGregor, you referred to his observation about the fact that we all have filters through which we see the world. In those 40 years of dance making, seeing and writing, what have you learned about your own filters?

WP: Because I choreographed for 30 years, I see through the filter of a choreographer. When I look at a new work, I look at the decisions the choreographer is making. Once they set up certain things -the number of people, the music- how do they make decisions within that? I notice it mostly when I talk with some of my other colleagues, especially at Dance Magazine, where a lot of them have been dancers or trained as dancers, but none of them were choreographers. They look at work from the dancer’s point of view. Of course, I look at work that way too, and that’s why I called my book Through the Eyes of a Dancer, but when I look at choreography and think about it, I am looking at the process of making decisions. But my filter changes. I have recently been judging a lot of ballet competitions. Everyone else on the panel was looking at the dancers’ feet. Instead, I was looking at how the person’s dance spirit came out of them. But in the last competition that I did, which was about contemporary dance, I found myself looking at the feet! Sometimes, another person’s filter is contagious. When you are sitting in a panel discussion with Artistic Directors of ballet companies or ballet schools, you see through their eyes as well. There is also the filter of the fact that I danced with Trisha Brown and I love her work. Sometimes, I see a piece that looks too much like her work and I realize that the choreographer doesn’t really understand where the movements came from. Very often, the past comes into seeing. One of the latter blogs mentioned in my book is about Twyla Tharp. I was looking at her recent piece on Broadway with the filter of how exciting her work was in the seventies, and how big of an impact it had on me, as a woman, at that time. So looking at her recent Broadway show, when it opened out of town in Atlanta, I can look at it with the filter of asking ‘does it have what it needs in order to be successful on Broadway?’ or I can consider the piece through the filter of how exciting the work was in the seventies, and see that now that stimulation is gone. Sometimes, there is more than one filter. But I try to come to a work with a clean slate, especially when I see something brand new. But as Wayne McGregor says, we all have our filters.

Wendy Perron (background) and Vicky Shick (foreground) performing Trisha Brown's "Spanish Dance" in 2012 Photo by Hal Horowiz

Wendy Perron (background)
and Vicky Shick (foreground)
performing Trisha Brown’s “Spanish Dance”
in 2012
Photo by Hal Horowiz

MT: You mentioned looking at how choreographers make decisions when watching work. The term “choreographic thinking” has been very present lately in the contemporary dance discourse. In a blog entry included in your book, you refer to “that preverbal place” that choreographers have to dig into to make work. Would you define choreographic thinking as a ‘preverbal place’?

WP: No, I haven’t heard that exact term but to me, there are two stages: the preverbal stage is more like a dreamlike place, almost like capturing a feeling you may have had in a dream, or something that is intangible or unexplainable. I feel that’s the first place to go. Then choreographic thinking would be more about time and space, how you move people around, how you organize from here to there. I would say that the preverbal space is more subconscious. There are choreographers whom I’ve seen whose choreographic thinking is very strong -they’re very good with patterns for instance- but you feel they haven’t visited these unconscious places. I’ve done pieces where I feel that I didn’t get to that preverbal place, I didn’t tap into the unconscious. I used the term ‘preverbal place’ in a blog entry objecting to choreographers blogging about their process and I got into a lot of trouble for writing that. I think it is good that choreographers are learning how to write about their work. Yet, at times, it’s premature. Sometimes you don’t really know what the work is about until you see it on stage when it is finished. And as Stravinsky said, sometimes you have to muck around in the dark, and then you can start to see what you put together.

MT: In your 1976 article entitled “Exporting Soho,” you mention the huge success of American dance in Europe. When publishing the book, you added that the situation is now reversed, as European choreographers are exporting their work somehow disproportionally to the United States. In your opinion, what are the reasons of this shift and what can be done better to insert American dance artists into the international dance scene?

WP: I am not a presenter so I don’t really know about strategies to export American dance artists. I think the American choreographers planted seeds of the American modern dance in Europe, and those seeds took root and have grown. I don’t think it’s so bad that we’re now seeing an influx of a lot of European companies coming to the United States. When it first started happening, it was very hard to get an audience in places like Dance Theater Workshop or the Danspace Project, which always presented New York artists, but the situation has changed. New Yorkers are seeing a much more international range of artists now, which I think is a good thing. But I’m no longer a choreographer trying to get work. My work now is seeing and writing about things, so I’m happy with what’s coming through.

Shifting the Perspectives | By Marie Tollon

Sandia Langlois in  Jo Kreiter's "TORQUE/ Dance on a Bike on a Rope"

Sandia Langlois in
Jo Kreiter’s “TORQUE/
Dance on a Bike on a Rope”

Artists constantly play with our perceptions of the world, the “known” – revisiting them, proposing altered possibilities, and presenting us with new ways to engage with our surroundings. Last weekend, during the RAWdance’s CONCEPT series 15, choreographer Jo Kreiter transformed a bicycle into both a hanging sculpture and a dance partner in TORQUE/Dance on a Bike on a Rope. Performer Sandia Langlois successively rolled, hung, pushed, climbed, and was swept away by the two-wheeler in a way that makes it now impossible for me to look at the common bicycle as a simple tool for navigation. Not unlike the cycle sculptures that artist Max Chen created for choreographer KT Nelson’s Transit, Kreiter and Langlois converted the bike into an astute and poetic partner.

In the same program, dancer and choreographer Christian Burns challenged the common perception of repetition as an action deprived of the new. Improvisation #72 started as Burns sat on the bleachers’ steps, stood up, looked left before entering the space with the calm receptivity of a seasoned performer. Throughout the piece, Burns repeated the sequence, coming back to his point of departure, at times altering the trajectory and outcome of his journey.

Christian Burns Photo by Andrea Basile

Christian Burns
Photo by Andrea Basile

The score superimposed Johann Sebastian Bach’s music with the voice of Burns sharing notes that he had taken during his research. Some read: “Repetition is about new outcomes… To repeat is to approach another new future in that moment.” Burns’ investigation quietly called to mind Danish philosopher Søren Kierkergaard’s work Repetition in which the protagonist questions whether repetition is even a possibility. If one could recognize movements that the dancer had performed earlier, Burns’ ability to dig into the present moment through his physicality brought the viewer to consider each gesture as entirely fresh, an open door to a new landscape.

Nichole Canuso in "Midway Avenue" Photo by Peggy Woolsey

Nichole Canuso in
“Midway Avenue”
Photo by Peggy Woolsey

At ODC Theater the same weekend, Philadelphia-based choreographer Nichole Canuso helped me hear Frédéric Chopin’s Nocturnes in a new way. As she sat still in her Midway Avenue, she interrupted a two-minute silence to narrate the specific circumstances in which Chopin created the Nocturne that was playing in the background. She recounted that Chopin had composed the score while on the Spanish island of Mallorca, on a day of torrential rain. When Canuso resumed her silence, I found myself reading the melancholy and accents of Mediterranean weather that the composer incorporated in the music. At other times, she emphasized its gusto by letting her monologue be sharply interrupted by a rush of vivacious notes that jolted her to another side of the stage. Throughout the piece, Canuso allowed the viewer to both hear and see new facets of Chopin’s versatile music.

This experience of renewed perceptions reminded me of New York-based choreographer Doug Elkins, who will be performing at the Walking Distance Dance Festival-SF at ODC (May 30-31, 2014). Elkins is known for reinterpreting classics and offering new ways of experiencing them. His Fraulein Maria (2006) shed new light on the 1959 musical The Sound of Music. With Mo(or)town/Redux (2012), Elkins revisited José Limon’s The Moor’s Pavane (1949), and provided his own take on William Shakespeare’s Othello. In the piece, the dancers weaved modern dance steps with hip hop grooves set to the tunes of Marvin Gaye, James Brown, Otis Redding and Amy Winehouse.

Doug Elkins' "Hapless Bizarre" Photo by Christopher Duggan

Doug Elkins’
“Hapless Bizarre”
Photo by Christopher Duggan

Elkins started his career as a B-Boy, touring the world with break dance groups New York Dance Express and Magnificent Force. He is recognized for crafting witty and humorous dances that mingle many genres of dance, providing what he calls a “collision of languages.” Dance critic Joan Acocella wrote that he will frequently “come out in front of the audience in his socks and do deadpan comedy.” It is therefore not a surprise that Hapless Bizarre, his most recent work and the one he will present at the Walking Distance Dance Festival-SF, explores the boundaries between physical comedy and dance. Referencing early performers like Chaplin, Tati, Keaton, and The Marx Brothers, Elkins investigates the colossal expressivity of the body. In anticipation of his performance, I am curious to discover in what direction the choreographer will instigate yet another shift in the way we experience dance.